LAWSUIT RESEARCH

Disqualification/Recusal

Aetna Life Insurance v. Lavoie
475 U.S. 813 (1986)

Liljeberg v Health Services Acquisition Company
486 U.S. 8... (1987

863-4:  "Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) provides a procedure whereby, in appropriate cases, a party may be relieved of a final judgment. [Footnote 10] In particular, Rule 60(b)(6), upon which respondent relies, grants federal courts broad authority to relieve a party from a final judgment "upon such terms as are just," provided that the motion is made within a reasonable time and is not premised on one of the grounds for relief enumerated in clauses (b)(1) through (b)(5). [Footnote 11] The Rule does not particularize the factors that justify relief, but we have previously noted that it provides courts with authority "adequate to enable them to vacate judgments whenever such action is appropriate to accomplish justice," Klapprott v. United States, 335 U. S. 601, 335 U. S. 614-615 (1949), while also cautioning that it should only be applied in "extraordinary circumstances," Ackermann v. United States, 340 U. S. 193 (1950). 

Caperton v. Massey,  opinions
556 U.S. 868 (2009)

Landmark Communications v. Virginia

ROBINSON v. STATE OF N.J, 806 F.2d 442, 450 (3rd Cir. 1986)

* * *

Percoco v. United States | Oyez

January 20, 2026  - 25-90117-jm -25-90120-jm.pdf

August 28, 2025 -- 23-90052-jm.pdf

July 16, 2024
23-90025-jm, 23-90031-jm, 23-90073-jm, 24-90004-6-jm, 24-90012-jm, 24-90022-jm, 24-90055-jm.pdf

LOHIER

April 8, 2026 -- 25-90039-jm.pdf

February 11, 2026 -- 25-90033-jm, 25-90104-jm.pdf

November 10, 2025 -- 25-90033-jm, 25-90104-jm.pdf

IN RE SASSOWER, 510 U.S. 4 (1993)
October 12, 1993

In Re George Sassower, 20 F.3d 42 (2d Cir. 1993)

In re Sassower, --- U.S. ----, 114 S. Ct. 2, 126 L. Ed. 2d 6 (1993); Demos v. Storrie, --- U.S. ----, 113 S. Ct. 1231, 122 L. Ed. 2d 636 (1993). A "leave of court" requirement or other restrictions have been imposed upon Sassower by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Sassower v. Mahoney, No. 88-6203, 1987 WL 26596 (2d Cir. Dec. 3, 1990), the District Court for the Eastern District of New York, In re Sassower, 700 F. Supp. 100 (E.D.N.Y. 1988), and the District Court for the Southern District of New York, United States f/b/o Sassower v. Sapir, 87 Civ. 7135, 1987 WL 26596 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 1987); Raffe v. Doe, 619 F. Supp. 891 (S.D.N.Y. 1985); see also In re Martin-Trigona, 9 F.3d 226 (2d Cir. 1993) (explaining "leave of court" procedures applicable to Sassower and another sanctioned litigant in the Court of Appeals).

7-10-09-gs-instrument-of-crime.pdf
"Where 'jurisdiction' is absent, the jurist, despite the physical adornment of his/her judicial robe & judicial title
is legally disrobed, is a usurper, a pretender, imposter and impersonator of

*Nos. 93-8528 -- (July 9, 1993 Brieant),

*93-8529 (July 9, 1993 Oakes)

Oakes  April 16, 1987 decision