TESTING THE PROPOSITION:

"... any publicly made (non-frivolous) allegation of

serious misconduct ... against a Supreme Court Justice

would receive intense scrutiny in the press..."

    — 1993 Report of the National Commission on Judicial Discipline & Removal
(at p. 122)


 

TEST #1:  1998  -- IMPEACHMENT COMPLAINT AGAINST CHIEF JUSTICE REHNQUIST AND THE ASSOCIATE JUSTICES -- and the House Judiciary Committee’s Cover-Up of the Hundreds of Judicial Impeachment Complaints It Receives    

     

 

TEST #2:    2004 -- SUPPLEMENT TO IMPEACHMENT COMPLAINT.
Supreme Court's impeachable repudiation of Congressionally-imposed obligations of disqualification & disclosure under 28 USC 455 & disregard for the single recommendation addressed to it by the 1993 Report of the National Commission on Judicial Discipline & Removal that it consider establishing an internal mechanism to review judicial misconduct complaints against its justices.



TEST #3:    2007 -- "DISRUPTION OF CONGRESS" CASE --
"How Does the U.S. Supreme Court Handles Misconduct Complaints against its Staff?"

CJA Homepage  •  Latest News  •  Join Us  •  Site Search