|
|
LOG -- PRESS OUTREACH
June 2021
1.
NATIONAL REVIEW
CJA's June 1, 2021 e-mail to Dan McLaughlin --
LEAD -- Senate Judiciary Committee procedures for vetting
Gov. Cuomo's nominations
of Singas & Cannataro to the NY
Court of Appeals -- & request to testify in strong
opposition at their confirmation hearings, with EVIDENCE,
decisive of their unfitness"
CJA's June 2, 2012 e-mail to McLaughlin --
"What is your professional judgment -- as a journalist &
seasoned lawyer -- of the primary-source, documentary
EVIDENCE I have furnished you?"
CJA's June 3, 2021 e-mail to McLaughlin --
"LEAD -- ALERT: Is the Senate dispensing with
confirmation hearings
on the nominations of Singas &
Cannataro to the Court of Appeals? Or are the hearings
to be without public notice, without opposition
testimony, & without prior vetting of EVIDENCE?"
(see
below)
CJA's June 4, 2021 e-mail to McLaughlin
--
"What is your professional judgment -- as a journalist &
seasoned lawyer -- of the primary-source, documentary
EVIDENCE I have furnished you, by my 3 prior e-mails -- & by
the below?"
2.
LEGISLATIVE CORRESPONDENTS ASSOCIATION
REPORTERS
CJA's June 3, 2021 e-mail --
"ALERT: Is the Senate dispensing with confirmation
hearings
on the nominations of Singas & Cannataro to the
Court of Appeals? Or are the hearings to be without
public notice, without opposition testimony, & without prior
vetting of EVIDENCE?"
CJA's June 7, 2021 e-mail --
"ALERT: Tomorrow's
Senate Judiciary Committee 'meeting' on the nominations of
Singas & Cannataro to the NY Court of Appeals --
UNCONSTITUTIONAL & FRAUDULENT: no vetting of EVIDENCE
decisive of the nominees' unfitness" --
transmitting:
CJA's June 7, 2021 e-mail
to the Senate Judiciary Committee's 15 Members --
"Your tomorrow's 'meeting' on the
nominations of Singas & Cannataro to the NY Court of Appeals --
UNCONSTITUTIONAL & FRAUDULENT, as it has not been preceded by
vetting of the EVIDENCE decisive of their unfitness, of which
you have had NOTICE"
click here for:
EVIDENTIARY WEBPAGE & Questions for D.A. Singas
click here for:
EVIDENTIARY WEBPAGE & Questions for Judge Cannataro
3.
cc:
NEW YORK TIMES --
CJA's June 14, 2021 e-mail to
Democratic Manhattan D.A. Candidates --
"So, you want to be Manhattan D.A.,
here's the info & EVIDENCE in support of your whistle-blowing, NOW
--
& your duty, IF elected, to present same to a Manhattan grand
jury"
EVIDENTIARY WEBPAGE
4.
CJA's
June 15, 2021 e-mail to NYC press --
"Behind-the-Scenes:
Testing the fitness of the Manhattan D.A. candidates, with
EVIDENCE --
public corruption & the grand jury
responsibilities of the D.A.'s office"
Daily News
New York Post
Wall Street Journal
WNYC/Gothamist
&
here
New York Focus & The City
Gotham Gazette
City Limits
City & State
Politico - NY
Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism - CUNY
ProPublica -- see
CJA's webpage for ProPublica
5.
CJA's June 16, 2021 e-mail to NYC press
--
CJA's June 16, 2021 e-mail to Bloomberg
--
"Your
article 'Manhattan D.A. Candidate Plows $8 Million Into Her Campaign'
(Bloomberg, 6/15/21)"
CJA's June 16, 2021 e-mail to New York Magazine --
"your
article 'Wall Street's Favorite DA Candidate Donated $8.2(M)
to Her
Own Campaign' (New York Magazine, June 15, 2021)"
CJA's June 16, 2021 e-mail to The Intercept
--
"Your
article 'Wall Street's Candidate Gave Herself $8.2M
for
Manhattan District Attorney Race' (Intercept, June 15, 2021)"
CJA's June 16, 2021 message to New York Law Journal
--
sent via its website
6.
PROPUBLICA
CJA's June 18, 2021 e-mail to ProPublica
--
"The Ethics of Your Journalism -- 'Leading Manhattan
DA Candidate
Has Repeatedly Paid Virtually No Federal
Income Taxes' (ProPublica, 6/15/21)"
CJA's June 19, 2021 e-mail to
ProPublica
--
"TO: ProPublica General Counsel
Kutner --
'The Ethics of Your Journalism -- 'Leading Manhattan DA Candidate
Has Repeatedly Paid Virtually No Federal Income Taxes' (ProPublica,
6/15/21)"
* * *
Jan 2021 LOG Feb-March 2021 LOG
April-May 2021 LOG
June 2021 LOG
Aug 2021 LOG
NEW YORK's "FAKE NEWS"/CORRUPTION-ABETTING,
ELECTION-RIGGING
PRESS
|
|
|
|
