THE NEW YORK TIMES
Paper Trail of Suppression, Protectionism,
Blackballing, & Election-Rigging

2004

CJA's January 21, 2004 memo to Albany Bureua Chief James McKinley
     SEE:  Judicial Selection - NY -- "Merit Selection" to the NY Court of Appeals: Smith


CJA's March 1, 2004 story proposal to Michael Janofsky/Linda Greenhouse
    SEE:  Press Suppression - Special Topics: National Commission on Judicial Discipline & Removal -- Test #2


CJA's March 3, 2004 supplement to story proposal  


CJA's March 15, 2004 memo to Greenhouse  


Michael Janofsky's March 15, 2004 e-mail

CJA's May 11, 2004 letter to Raymond Hernandez/Washington Bureau --
"Critically Examining the Record of New York Senator Charles Schumer on Judicial Selection, Discipline, and Constituent Services Relating Thereto"
     SEE: "Paper Trail to Jail" in the "disruption of Congress" case


CJA's May 11, 2004 transmitting e-mail to Hernandez (11:05 a.m.)


Raymond Hernandez' May 11, 2004 acknowledgments (11:42 a.m.) (12:36 p.m.)


CJA's May 11, 2004 fax to Hernandez (2:30 p.m.)


CJA's May 17, 2004 e-mail to Hernandez --
"'Judicial Scandal' -- By: Robert Novak"


CJA's May 24, 2004 memo to Gerry Mulaney, Deputy Metro Editor for Politics -- "Proposal to You and ALL Relevant Times Editors Involved in Election Coverage for a Critical Examination of the Record of Senator Charles Schumer on Judicial Selection, Discipline, and Constituent Services Relating Thereto"
   [indicated copy to Hernandez]


CJA's June 17, 2004 e-mail to Public Editor Daniel Okrent (3:21 p.m.) --
"Complaint of Times' 'Protectionism' of NY Senator Schumer, Arising from Multitudinous Conflicts of Interest..."
  [indicated copies to Metro, Hernandez]


CJA's June 17, 2004 complaint to Public Editor Okrent --
"Times 'Protectionism' of New York Senator Charles Schumer, Arising from its Multitudinous Conflicts of Interest -- Covering Up his Pivotal Role in the Corruption of Judicial Selection and Discipline -- and Depriving New Yorkers of the Information Necessary to their Casting an Intelligent Vote in the 2004 Senate Election"
  [indicated copies Mulaney, Hernandez, The Public]


June 17, 2004 automated e-mail acknowledgment (3:28 p.m.)


Bovino's June 17, 2004 e-mail (3:34 p.m.)


CJA's June 17, 2004 e-mail to Bovino (4:29 p.m.)


Bovino's June 17, 2004 e-mail (4:43 p.m.)


CJA's June 17, 2004 e-mail to Bovino (5:56 p.m.)


Bovino's June 17, 2004 e-mail (10:12 p.m.)


CJA's June 18, 2004 e-mail to Bovino
  [indicated copies to Metro, Hernandez]


CJA's June 20, 2004 e-mail to Okrent
  [indicated copies to Metro, Hernandez]


Okrent's June 21, 2004 e-mail --
"CJA"

CJA's June 22, 2004 e-mail to Okrent (9:32 a.m.) --
"Did You Yourself Actually Read CJA's June 17, 2004 Complaint -- and Review the Substantiating Cited Evidence"


Bovino's June 22, 2004 e-mail (9:47 a.m.) --
"'Did You Yourself Actually Read CJA's June 17, 2004 Complaint -- and Review the Substantiating Cited Evidence'"


CJA's June 22, 2004 e-mail to Bovino (10:48 a.m.) --
"Does Mr. Okrent Deny or Dispute the Evidentiary Significance of the 'Paper Trail' -- Warranting Times Coverage by ANY OBJECTIVE STANDARD"


Bovino's June 22, 2004 e-mail (11:14 a.m.)


CJA's June 22, 2004 e-mail to Bovino (3:07 p.m.) --
"The 'Matter' is NOT 'CLOSED' -- and Mr. Okrent's Response, as Public Editor, Should be (by) Letter Signed by Him"


CJA's June 25, 2004 e-mail -- cc: Okrent, Mulaney, Taubman, Hernandez, Lewis --
"Follow-Up Coverage: 'Disruption of Congress' -- June 28th Sentencing"