|
TESTING IN A
SINGLE PERFECT CASE
THE CHECKS ON
FEDERAL JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT
TOUTED BY THE 1993
REPORT OF
THE NATIONAL
COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE & REMOVAL
— and documenting their
complete worthlessness
*
* * *
A public
interest lawsuit to protect
judicial
whistle-blowing attorneys from judicial retaliation
DORIS L.
SASSOWER,
Plaintiff,
-
v -
HON. GUY MANGANO, PRESIDING
JUSTICE OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT OF
THE SUPREME COURT OF
THE STATE OF NEW YORK, and
the ASSOCIATE JUSTICES THEREOF, GARY CASELLA and EDWARD
SUMBER, Chief Counsel and Chairman, respectively, of the
GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE FOR THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT,
GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE FOR THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT,
Does 1-20, being present members thereof, MAX GALFUNT,
being a Special Referee, and G. OLIVER KOPPELL, Attorney
General of the State
of New York, all in their official and personal
capacities,
Defendants.
DISTRICT COURT/SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW
YORK
(S.D.N.Y. #94 Civ. 4514
(JES))
SECOND CIRCUIT COURT
OF APPEALS
(#96-7805)
UNITED STATES SUPREME
COURT
(#98-106)
CONTINUES with:
TEST #1 -- 1999:
November 6, 1998 IMPEACHMENT COMPLAINT --
& THE 1993 REPORT OF THE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL
DISCIPLINE & REMOVAL
2004 SUPPLEMENT TO IMPEACHMENT COMPLAINT
-- &
TEST #2:
Supreme Court's impeachable
repudiation of Congressionally-imposed obligations of
disqualification & disclosure under 28 USC 455 & disregard for the
single recommendation
addressed to it by the 1993 Report of the National Commission
on Judicial Discipline & Removal that it consider establishing an
internal mechanism to review judicial misconduct complaints against
its justices.
AND,
ADDITIONALLY -- on the state level --
CJA's October 6, 1998
judicial misconduct complaint against the Appellate Division, Second
Department Justices, filed with the New York State Commission on
Judicial Conduct
-- based upon their readily-verifiable litigation misconduct & fraud in
Sassower v. Mangano
-- resulting in
Test Cases-State (COMMISSION)
|
