|
|
March 20, 2019 "Reader Center -- Understanding The Times" "Times Insider" New York Times -- www.nytimes.com/tips
CJA's March 20, 2019 e-mail to TIPS@NYTIMES.COM --
(The
citizen-taxpayer action, brought by our non-partisan, non-profit
citizens’ organization, Center for Judicial Accountability, Inc.
(CJA), sues New York’s three government branches and furnishes the
law and EVIDENCE establishing the unconstitutionality and
unlawfulness of the legislative budget, the judiciary budget, and
the executive budget – including the unconstitutionality and
unlawfulness of the commission-based judicial salary increases it
embeds, arising from a statute inserted into the fiscal year
2015-2016 budget by the “three-men-in-a-room” as part of their
budget deal-making. Among the lawsuit’s ten causes of action
is one challenging the constitutionality of “three-men-in-a-room”
budget deal-making – the FIRST such cause of action ever, as,
likewise, the first-ever challenge to behind-closed-door legislative
party conferences that substitute for open legislative committee
meetings –
http://www.judgewatch.org/web-pages/searching-nys/budget/citizen-taxpayer-action/2nd/menu-2nd-citizen-taxpayer-action.htm;
(The
Senate and Assembly “amended” budget bills, released last week and
embodied in last week’s Senate and Assembly one-house budget
resolutions – were NEVER “amended” by any legislator voting at a
committee meeting and the alterations they make to the Governor’s
budget bills flagrantly violate Article VII, §4
of the NYS Constitution. The joint Senate/Assembly budget
conference committees, convened last week, have VANISHED from view –
being only “fronts” for behind-closed-doors staff maneuverings and
the “three-men-in-a-room” budget deal-making of the Governor,
Temporary Senate President, and Assembly Speaker, NOW underway,
further “amending”, behind-closed-doors, budget bills without a vote
to “amend” by a single legislator &, again, in ways flagrantly
violating Article VII, §4 –
http://www.judgewatch.org/web-pages/searching-nys/2019-legislative/2019-finance-ways-means.htm;
http://www.judgewatch.org/web-pages/searching-nys/2019-legislative/senate-budget-revenues.htm;
http://www.judgewatch.org/web-pages/searching-nys/2019-legislative/back-to-both-houses.htm);
(There is
no empirical difference
between (a) “full-time” legislators versus “part-time” legislators;
(b) lawyer legislators versus non-lawyer legislators; (c) newbie
legislators versus veteran legislators; (d) Democratic &/or
“progressive” legislators versus Republican &/or “conservative”
legislators. None will confront law or EVIDENCE – and there
isn’t a whistle-blower among them:
http://www.judgewatch.org/web-pages/searching-nys/2019-legislative/menu-2019-legislative-session.htm);
March 16, 2019
March 18, 2019
“'The
process seems very similar,' said Blair Horner, the executive
director of the New York Public Interest Research Group, and a
former aide to Mr. Cuomo. 'But the product is obviously very
different because you have a new majority in the Senate.' Most of the deals announced on Sunday were largely made behind closed doors, and left to the 11th hour: Voting was likely to push right up to, and perhaps past, the midnight deadline.
Mr. Cuomo, who has been criticized for
sponsoring big-money fund-raisers, also announced a commission to
develop a plan to provide up to $100 million annually in public
financing for campaigns for legislative and statewide offices,
including his own. The commission’s recommendations, due in
December, would be legally binding unless the Legislature convened
specifically to overrule them.
April 11, 2019
November 25, 2018
December 6, 2018
December 6, 2018
December 9, 2018
December 13, 2018
December 20, 2018
January 12, 2019
|
|
|
CJA Ho
|