|
JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT
#11
CJA's February 3, 1999 complaint vs Appellate
Division, 2nd Dept. Justice Daniel Joy
Commission's February 5,
1999 letter
CJA's March 11, 1999 letter to
Commission
Ex. A:
CJA's 3/10/95 letter to Commissioners, requesting information about the
Commission's dismissal
of its eight
judicial misconduct complaints against powerful, politically-connected judges
Ex. B-1: "Determining
Generally When 'Error' is Misconduct", from 1987 law review article by
Gerald Stern,
Ex. B-2: pages
from Commission's post-hearing memorandum in Matter of Slavin
Ex. C:
Exchange of letters relating to CJA's request, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 7001 et seq.
and the Freedom of
Information Law, for information concerning the promulgation
of 22 NYCRR 7000
et seq.
Ex. D:
Exchange of letters in support of CJA's request for Commission's reconsideration
of its summary dismissal of
CJA's 9/19/94 judicial misconduct complaint,
based on the principles for
disciplinary review set forth in Gerald
Stern's law review article
as to "...When 'Error' is Misconduct"
Ex. E:
Exchange of letters relating to the City Bar's 5/14/97 hearing and CJA's
challenge
to the Commission to
address the case file proof that the Commission was the beneficiary
of a
fraudulent judicial decision in Doris L. Sassower v. Commission
ARTICLE 78 PROCEEDING
-- E. R. Sassower...v. Commission
CJA's
May 17, 1999 NOTICE-DEMAND to Commission
CJA's
February 7, 2000 NOTICE to Commission
|
