|
|
|
|
WHAT A
METHODOLOGICALLY-SOUND REVIEW
OF THE NEW YORK STATE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT WOULD LOOK LIKE UNDER CONSTRUCTION -- Come back later Commission members 1. 2. Examining the Law, as Applied --
Commission's May 9, 2003 letter
Tembeckjian's Sepember 22, 2009 e-mail & letter
CJA's February 26, 2019 FOIL request to Commission -- 3. Examining the History of Oversight A. LEGISLATIVE OVERSIGHT -- NONE no oversight hearing by any legislative committee since 2009 when the Senate Judiciary Committee aborted hearings, after the 2nd, without any investigation of the witness testimony, documentary evidence received, without making any findings or rendering any committee report
click here for: CJA's DISPOSITIVE written testimony drafted for aborted 3rd hearing, scheduled for December 16, 2009 Questions: (1) Why did the Senate Judiciary Committee not continue the 2009 hearings, and why was there no investigation, no findings, no committee report as to the evidence the Committee had received in connection with those hearings; The Commission & the "Public Protection" Budget Hearings 4. GOING FORWARD -- Testimony of witnesses with direct, first-hand interaction -- starting with complainants & their substantiating complaints, FOIL requests, and lawsuits
CJA's February 14, 2019 FOIL request to Senate & Assembly --
Senate's February 22, 2019 response link:
Video -- February 14, 2007 budget hearing
Senate's February 25, 2019 response
Senate's February 25, 2019 response
CJA's February 26, 2019 FOIL request to Commission on Judicial Conduct --"Lawsuit challenges to the Commission on Judicial Conduct, particularly by complainants whose complaints the Commission dismissed or had not determined"
Robert Tembeckjian's Sepember 22,
2009 e-mail & letter to CJA (with copies to Senator Sampson
& Timothy Spotts, Esq.)
January 13, 2022 "Wanted: A federal Judicial Inspector General" Robert Tembeckjian -- The Hill |
|
|
|
CJA Ho |
|
|
Mailing
Address: |
