|
|
CONSERVATIVE PARTY LAWSUIT vs PUBLIC CAMPAIGN FINANCING & ELECTION COMMISSION
click here for record: (Niagara County #E169561/2019) 1.
Plaintiffs bring this declaratory
judgment action against Defendants seeking a determination
that Part XXX of the Laws of 2019, Chapter 59, Bill No.
S01509C (‘Statute’), enacted by the New York State
Legislature (“Legislature”) with the approval of the
Governor, creating a public campaign financing and election
commission is unconstitutional. Part XXX (“Statute”)
creates a commission entitled Public Campaign Financing and
Election Commission of the State of New York (“Commission”),
which is comprised of nine individual commissioners
appointed by the Governor and the Majority and Minority
leaders of the Assembly and the Senate…. A determination
made by a majority of the Commissioners will have the force
of law and will supersede any inconsistent provision of the
Election Law, unless the Legislature affirmatively repeals
or amends by statute the law enacted by the Commission. 2.
The enactment of the Statute
and the creation of the Commission are in violation of the
Constitution of the State of New York
(“Constitution”)…Accordingly, Plaintiffs seek a judgment
declaring that: (1) the Statute violates the Constitution
because it improperly delegates to the Commission the core
legislative function of creating, repealing, and amending
basic provisions of New York statutory law (e.g., the
Election Law); (2) the Statute violates the Constitution
because it authorizes the creation of law by the Commission
without requiring an equivalent legislative act to repeal an
act of the Legislature;… 15.
Defendant Governor is head of the executive branch of the
government of the State of New York. The Governor’s
powers and duties are expressly set forth in the
Constitution. The Governor approved the Statute that
created the Commission and has appointed commissioners
thereto. 16.
Defendant Assembly is a house of the Legislature empowered
under the Constitution to exercise the legislative function.
The Assembly adopted the Statute. 19.
Defendant Senate is a house of the Legislature empowered
under the Constitution to exercise the legislative function.
The Senate adopted the Statute. C. The Constitution 43. Article III Section
1 of the Constitution sets forth the power of the
Legislature and states that “[t]he legislative power of the
state shall be vested in the senate and assembly” 44. Article III,
Section 13 of the Constitution further states that “no law
shall be enacted except by bill.” 45. Article III,
Section 14 of the Constitution further states that “no bill
shall be passed or become a law…except by the assent of a
majority of the members elected to each branch of the
legislature.” D. The Statute is
Unconstitutional 46. Pursuant to the
Constitution, the Legislature may not delegate its lawmaking
power to an administrative agency. 48. The Statute is
unconstitutional as it delegates to the Commission the core
legislative function of creating, repealing, and amending
New York State Election Law. 49. Pursuant to the
Constitution, a statute enacted by the Legislature may not
be amended or repealed but for a legislative act of equal
dignity and import. Nothing less than another statute
will suffice. 51. A determination by
the Commission is not a legislative act of equal dignity to
that of a statute enacted by a vote of the Legislature and
approved by the governor. 52. The Statute is
unconstitutional as it authorizes the Commission to create,
amend, and repeal law enacted by a vote of the Legislature
without requiring an equivalent legislative act. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION 58. In the Statute, the
Commission is permitted to freely enact new laws governing
multiple party candidate nominations and/or designations and
to repeal or amend provisions of the Election Law as enacted
by the Legislature. 59. That portion of the
Statute is unconstitutional on its face as an improper
delegation of the Legislature’s lawmaking power. SECOND CAUSE OF
ACTION 63. Pursuant to the
Statute, each recommendation made to implement a
determination by the Commission “shall have the force of
law, and shall supersede, where appropriate, inconsistent
provisions of the election law, unless modified or abrogated
by statute prior to December 22, 2019.” See Ex A, 5. 64. Thus, the Statute
gives the Commission authority to repeal existing law
enacted by the Legislature without a majority vote of the
Legislature that enacted the law being repealed. 65. That portion of
Statute is unconstitutional on its face as it violates the
equivalency doctrine.” … WHEREFORE,
Plaintiffs ask this Court for an order and declaratory
judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants: (a)
declaring the Statute
unconstitutional because it improperly delegates the
Legislature’s lawmaking power to the Commission; (b)
declaring the Statute
unconstitutional because it authorizes the Commission to
create, amend, and repeal law enacted by a vote of the
Legislature without requiring an equivalent legislative act; …
Who is the
Legislative Plaintiff? -- Assemblyman Colin Schmitt
Acting Supreme Court/Court of Claims Judge Richard C. Kloch ballotopedia
----------------------------------------------- Press Reporting & Editorializing
***************************** [budget resource page -- constitutional, statutory, rule provisions & caselaw]
|
|
|
CJA Ho
|