APPELLATE DIVISION,
FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
CJA'S November 16, 2001
Interim Relief Application
Exhibit C:
CJA's November 13, 2001 letter to Appellate Division Presiding Justice
& appellate panel
Exhibit D:
CJA's November 15, 2001 memo to A.G. Spitzer & Solicitor General
Halligan
Nov. 19, 2001 denial of Interim relief application
by Justice Nardelli, Presiding Justice of assigned
appellate panel
******************************************************************************************************************************************
CJA's
November 19, 2001 Letter to Appellate Division, 1st Dept. Presiding Justice
Sullivan
CJA'S handwritten November 19, 2001 letter -- and
Justice Sullivan's November
20, 2001 denial
*******************************************************************************************************************
CJA's
November 30, 2001 Letter to Appellate Panel
Exhibit A: Appellant's oral argument: November 21, 2001
******************************************************************************************************************
APPELLATE DIVISION'S DECEMBER 18, 2001 DECISION & ORDER
(Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Andrias, Betty
Weinberg Ellerin, Rubin)
******************************************************************************************************************
CJA'S
JANUARY 17, 2002 REARGUMENT MOTION
TABLE OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit A-1: Appellate Division's December 18, 2001 decision
Exhibit A-2: sentence-marked reprint from New York Law Journal
Exhibit
B-1: CJA's January 7, 2002 notice to A.G. Spitzer & Commission:
19-page analysis
of Appellate Division's December 18, 2001 decision
Exhibit
B-2: Commission's acknowledgment, January 11, 2002
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S FEBRUARY 7, 2002 OPPOSING AFFIDAVIT
CJA'S FEBRUARY
20,
2002 REPLY
AFFIDAVIT
Exhibit A: NYLJ
items, January 22, 2002, February 7, 2002
Exhibit B-1: CJA's
January 14, 2002 letter to A.G. Spitzer
Exhibit B-2: receipted 1st page/Notice of Reargument
Exhibit C-1: CJA's
January 23, 2002 letter-notice to A.G. Spitzer
Exhibit C-2: CJA's January 23, 2002 letter-notice to Solicitor General Halligan
Exhibit C-3: CJA's January 23, 2002 letter-notice to Commission
Exhibit
D-1: Asst. Solicitor General's February 4, 2002 letter
Exhibit D-2: CJA's February 4, 2002 letter
Exhibit D-3: Asst. Solicitor General's express mail envelope
Exhibit E-1: CJA's
February 12, 2002 letter-notice to A.G. Spitzer
Exhibit E-2: CJA's February 12, 2002 letter-notice to Solicitor General
Halligan
Exhibit E-3: CJA's February 12, 2002 letter-notice to Commission
Exhibit
F: CJA's January 22, 2002 letter to 1st Dept. Judicial Screening
Exhibit
G: CJA's February 7, 2002 letter to 1st Dept. Judicial Screening
Exhibit H-1: CJA's January 20, 2002 fax to Nan Weiner/Exec Director, Gov Pataki's
Judicial Screening Committees
Exhibit H-2: CJA's February 7, 2002 letter to Nan Weiner/Exec. Director, Gov Pataki's
Judicial Screening Committees
Exhibit H-3: CJA's February 13, 2002 fax to Nan Weiner/Exec. Director, Gov
Pataki's Judicial Screening Committees
Exhibit
I-1: CJA's January 23, 2002 letter to 1st Dept. Judicial Screening
Exhibit
I-2: CJA's February 13, 2002 letter to 1st Dept. Judicial Screening
APPELLATE
DIVISION'S MARCH 26, 2002 DECISION & ORDER
(Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Andrias, Betty Weinberg Ellerin, Rubin)
******************************************************************************************************************
CJA'S FEBRUARY 20, 2002 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S FEBRUARY 27, 2002 OPPOSING AFFIDAVIT
CJA'S MARCH
6, 2002 REPLY AFFIDAVIT IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF LEAVE TO APPEAL
TABLE
OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit B:
Sassower's February 20, 2002 hand-written notice to A.G.
Spitzer
APPELLATE DIVISION'S MARCH 26, 2002 DECISION & ORDER
(Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Andrias, Betty Weinberg Ellerin, Rubin)
***************************************************************************************************************
CJA's MAY 1,
2002 NOTICE OF APPEAL
--
served on the Commission, the Attorney General, &
Solicitor General
****************************************************************************************************************
continues with
NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS
|
