END OF THE NEW YORK TIMES' PUBLIC EDITOR

CJA's December 1, 2003 letter to Public Editor Daniel Okrent -- RE: "Bringing Long-Overdue Accountability and Responsiveness to The Times"
    [indicated copy to Keller]

CJA's December 24, 2003 e-mail to Public Editor Okrent -- RE: "Center for Judicial Accountability's Long-Standing & Unresponded-to Complaints, embodied by our Unresponded-to December 1st Letter to You"

December 24, 2003 automated e-mail acknowledgment -- "Thank you for your message"

December 24, 2003 e-mail from Arthur Bovino/Office of the Public Editor -- RE: "RE: Center for Judicial Accountability's Long-Standing & Unresponded-to Complaints, embodied by our Unresponded-to December 1st Letter to You"

JA's June 17, 2004 e-mail to Daniel Okrent (3:21 p.m.) -- RE: "Complaint of Times' 'Protectionism' of NY Senator Schumer, Arising from Multitudinous Conflicts of Interest..."
  [indicated copies to Metro, Hernandez]

CJA's June 17, 2004 complaint to Public Editor Daniel Okrent -- RE: "Times 'Protectionism' of New York Senator Charles Schumer, Arising from its Multitudinous Conflicts of Interest -- Covering Up his Pivotal Role in the Corruption of Judicial Selection and Discipline -- and Depriving New Yorkers of the Information Necessary to their Casting an Intelligent Vote in the 2004 Senate Election"
  [indicated copies Mulaney, Hernandez, The Public]

June 17, 2004 automated e-mail acknowledgment (3:28 p.m.)

Arthur Bovino's June 17, 2004 e-mail to CJA (3:34 p.m.)

CJA's e-mail to June 17, 2004 Arthur Bovino (4:29 p.m.)

Arthur Bovino's June 17, 2004 e-mail to CJA (4:43 p.m.)

CJA's June 17, 2004 e-mail to Arthur Bovino (5:56 p.m.)

Arthur Bovino's June 17, 2004 e-mail to CJA (10:12 p.m.)

CJA's June 18, 2004 e-mail to Arthur Bovino
  [indicated copies to Metro, Hernandez]

CJA's June 20, 2004 e-mail to Daniel Okrent
  [indicated copies to Metro, Hernandez]

June 21, 2004 e-mail from Daniel Okrent to CJA -- RE: "CJA"

CJA's June 22, 2004 e-mail to Daniel Okrent (9:32 a.m.) -- RE: "Did You Yourself Actually Read CJA's June 17, 2004 Complaint -- and Review the Substantiating Cited Evidence"

Arthur Bovino's June 22, 2004 e-mail to CJA (9:47 a.m.) -- RE:  "RE: 'Did You Yourself Actually Read CJA's June 17, 2004 Complaint -- and Review the Substantiating Cited Evidence'"

CJA's June 22, 2004 e-mail to Mr. Bovino (10:48 a.m.) -- RE: "Does Mr. Okrent Deny or Dispute the Evidentiary Significance of the 'Paper Trail' -- Warranting Times Coverage by ANY OBJECTIVE STANDARD"

Arthur Bovino's June 22, 2004 e-mail to CJA (11:14 a.m.)

CJA's June 22, 2004 e-mail to Arthur Bovino (3:07 p.m.) -- RE: "The 'Matter' is NOT 'CLOSED' -- and Mr. Okrent's Response, as Public Editor, Should be (by) Letter Signed by Him"

CJA's June 25, 2004 e-mail (cc) to Daniel Okrent, Mulaney, Taubman, Hernandez, Lewis -- RE: "Follow-Up Coverage: 'Disruption of Congress' -- June 28th Sentencing"

CJA's September 26, 2005 complaint to Byron Calame, Public Editor -- "RE: Bringing Long-Overdue Accountability and Responsiveness to The New York Times"
   [indicated copies to Sulzberger, Abramson, Siegal, Landman, Taubman, Collins (for sharing with ALL Editorial Board members), Fuchs, Hernandez,, Eaton, Hicks, Geraldo Rivera, Bill O'Reilly]

Byron Calame's September 30, 2005 e-mail response
    [indicated copies to Keller and to Calame's own assistant Plambeck]

CJA's September 1, 2011 complaint to New York Times Public Editor --
summarizing New York Times' performance throughout the course of Commission on Judicial Compensation's life span

             --  CJA's referred-to webpage:
Bringing Transparency, Evidence & Public Accountability to the One-Sided, Media-Created View (Swallowed Whole from the Judicial-Legal Establishment) that NYS Judges are Underpaid & Entitled to a Raise

CJA's September 1, 2011 letter to NYT Public Editor Arthur S. Brisbane -- "RE: Complaint against Reporter William Glaberson and the Editorial Board for Injuring the People of New York and Subverting their Constitutional Rights by  Knowingly False and Misleading Reporting and Editorializing on New York’s Judicial Compensation Issue"

                                                          Enclosures: 

      1)  CJA's August 5, 2011 letter to  NYT Reporter Glaberson -- "RE:  Setting the Record Straight:  Ensuring that the Public & New York’s Judicial Compensation Commission are Not Misled by New York Times’ Reporting & Editorializing about 'Judicial Attrition' and the Purportedly Insufficient Pay of New York State Judges"      
         --  CJA’s July 6, 2011 FOIL request, with e-mail receipt 
         --  OCA’s July 22, 2011 response
         --  CJA’s June 13, 2011 e-mail, with attached June 10, 2011 FOIL request
         --  ABAJournal.Com: “What America’s Lawyers Earn” - NYS’s 62 Counties

      2)  CJA's February 21, 2011 letter to NYT Reporter Glaberson -- "RE:  PROPOSAL FOR COVERAGE:  The public’s 'views' of the NYS Commission on Judicial Conduct, expressed at the NYS Senate Judiciary Committee hearings in 2009 – as to which neither the Senate Judiciary Committee, bar associations, nor advocacy organizations favored by The Times have rendered ANY report or made ANY findings"

      3)  CJA's February 21, 2011 letter to NYT Editorial Board -- "RE: REQUEST FOR A MEETING with the Editorial Board regarding prospective Times' editorials about the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct"

September 1, 2011 e-mail acknowledgment from NYT Public Editor Arthur S. Brisbane

CJA's November 17, 2011 letter to NYT Public Editor Arthur S. Brisbane -- "RE:  Status of CJA's September 1, 2011 Complaint -- & the NYT's Responsibility to Mitigate the Damage to the Public's Rights and Purse Causes by its Knowingly False and Misleading Reporting and Editorializing on NY's Judicial Compensation Issue"

Public Editor Brisbane's November 30, 2011 e-mail

April 11, 2017
"The New York Times' Public Editor is Bad at her Job"
The Outline (Leah Finnegan)

April 14, 2017
"Dear Public Editor: What are you doing?"
Slate (Will Oremus)

May 6, 2017:
"A Late Entry by the Times into the Fact-Checking Biz"

May 16, 2017
"A Conversation with Liz Spayd, the Controversal Public Editor of the New York Times"
The Atlantic (Adrienne LaFrance)

May 30, 2017
"Good Riddance to the NYT's Public Editor"
Politico (Tom Scocca)

May 31, 2017
"New York Times Public Editor Liz Spayd on decision to eliminate her position"
Columbia Journalism Review (Pete Vernon)

May 31, 2017
"New York Times Will Offer Employee Buyouts and Eliminate Public Editor Role"
New York Times (Daniel Victor)

May 31, 2017
"The New York Times is getting rid of its public editor for exactly the wrong reasons"
VOX (Dara Lind)

May 31, 2017
"Why The New York Times Fired its Public Editor in favor of a Reader Center"
Daily Beast (Lloyd Grove)

May 31, 2017
"The New York TImes is Eliminating the Public Editor Role"
HuffPost (Michael Calderone)

"Liz Spayd's final NY Times column shows why she failed as public editor"
Media Matters  (Matt Gertz)

May 31, 2017
"The New York Times eliminates editor position created after Jayson Blair scandal"
Washington Examiner (Melissa Quinn)

June 1, 2017
"The New York Times  is Wrong to Fire its Watchdog"
Slate (Will Oremus)

June 1, 2017
"At the New York Times, a Public Execution"
National Review  (Kyle Smith)

June 2, 2017
"The Public Editor Signs Off"

Introducing the Readers Center

We Want To Hear From You   August 8, 2017

----------------------------------------------

April 12, 2016
"Why he did it: Jayson Blair opens up about his plagiarism and fabriction at the New York Times" (Isabella Kwai)  Duke Reporters' Lab

June 2, 2016
"Notorious New York Times Fabulist Resurfaces at Surface Mag",
Observer  (Kara Bloomgarden-Smoke)

August 15, 2016
 "New York Times Reporter Jayson Blair On Plagiarizing For The First Time (Video)"
HuffPost

*   *   *

click here for:
OUTING CORRUPT & COLLUSIVE INCUMBENTS
& Ending their Road to Re-Election & Higher Office
in 2017, 2018, & Beyond -- WITH EVIDENCE!