About CJA
•
Our History
•
Our Mission
•
Who We Are
• Awards & Honors

Published Pieces

Testimony

Judicial Selection
•
Federal
• State-NY

Judicial Discipline
• Federal
•
State-NY

Test Cases:
• Federal (Mangano)
• State (Commission)

"Disruption of Congress"
•
Paper Trail to Jail
•
Paper Trail from Jail
• The Appeals

Elections:
Informing the Voters

Press Suppression

Suing The New York Times
•
Outreach
• Background Paper Trail

Searching for Champions:
    (Correspondence):

•
Federal
•
NYS
•
Bar Associations
• Academia
•
Organizations
• Nader & Others
• Citizens

Our Members' Efforts

Library

Join Us!

CHAMPIONING THE FIRST AMENDMENT --
& VINDICATING THE PUBLIC'S RIGHTS

            CJA'S Public Interest Lawsuit vs GANNETT

*      *     *
 
APPELLATE DIVISION -- SECOND DEPARTMENT

ORAL ARGUMENT

Appellate Division's advance calendar of oral argument for Monday, May 6, 2013

     Justice Peter B. Skelos  (Presiding Justice) 
    Justice Daniel D. Angiolillo
    Justice Sheri A. Roman
    Justice Syliva O Hinds-Radix 

Appellate Division's day calendar of oral argument for Monday, May 6, 2013


Plaintiff-Appellant Elena Sassower's May 6, 2013 written oral argument before Appellate Division, Second Department Justices Peter Skelos, Angiolillo, Roman, & Hinds-Radix --
           enclosure #1: R-589-595 from December 21, 2011 motion
           enclosure #2: April 15, 2013 criminal complaint to US Attorney Bharara vs Temporary Senate President Dean Skelos & NYS' other highest public officers


Plaintiff-Appellant Elena Sassower's May 6, 2013 letter to Apppellate Division, Chief Clerk Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk Agostino's May 7, 2013 letter

Deputy Clerk's June 12, 2013 letter to Doris Sassower

Doris Sassower's July 4, 2013 letter  --
signature pages; 
confirmation of oral argument

Deputy Clerk's July 29, 2013 letter

Appellate Division's August 21, 2013 decision & order   by four-judge panel consisting of Peter Skelos, as Presiding Justice, & Justices Daniel D. Angiolillo, Sheri S. Roman, & Sylvia Hinds-Radix  --   pdf decision
         AN UTTERLY FRAUDULENT DECISION, INSUPPORTABLE FACTUALLY & LEGALLY, accomplished by identifying NONE of the facts, law, or legal argument presented on the appeal & at oral argument

 

CJA's August 29, 2013 request pursuant to FOIL & 124 of the Rules of the Chief Administrator for records pertaining to Appellate Division, Second Department's audio/video recordings of its oral arguments

 


 

            

           
 

 

 

 

Top

 
CJA Site Search Engine Search CJA

CJA Homepage  •  Latest News  •  Join Us  •  Site Search